PDF) Impact Factor of Journals
Eigenfactor: Analysis of the CiteScore metric
Nature Methods Impact Factor 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 | Resurchify
The Relative Citation Ratio: It won't do your laundry, but can it exorcise the journal impact factor? | To infinity, and beyond!
Nature Medicine Impact Factor 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 | Resurchify
The most influential journals: Impact Factor and Eigenfactor | PNAS
NPG Announces “Nature Communications” Will Become Open Access Only Journal | LJ INFOdocket
Nature Chemistry Impact Factor 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 | Resurchify
Vincent Rajkumar on Twitter: "Blood Cancer Journal Impact factor 8.125 Our Features: -Current Treatment Algorithms -Published by @SpringerNature & -Hosted on Nature platform https://t.co/jtJT7zSlRf -Open Access We are going for #1 @Mohty_EBMT @
What is an impact of an article? (Part I) | Music & Science Lab
PLOS ONE Output Drops Again In 2016 - The Scholarly Kitchen
Beat it, impact factor! Publishing elite turns against controversial metric : Nature News & Comment
Journal impact factors: Frontiers at the top of citation and impact metrics – Science & research news | Frontiers
Challenge the impact factor | Nature Biomedical Engineering
The Impact Factor – Boston College Libraries Newsletter
Journal metrics | Nature Research
Nature
Controversial impact factor gets a heavyweight rival : Nature News & Comment
Axel Merseburger on Twitter: "Top 1-10 impact factor Urology 2016 - the sky is the limit @JohannesSalem @declangmurphy @DrHWoo @LoebStacy @HendrikBorgmann @miokra… https://t.co/OD1neX3Ywk"
Nature (journal) - Wikipedia
Frontiers journals in the top of impact metrics – Science & research news | Frontiers
Nature Communications Impact Factor 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014, 2013 | Resurchify
Journal metrics | Nature Research
![Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals [PeerJ]](https://dfzljdn9uc3pi.cloudfront.net/2016/1670/1/fig-5-2x.jpg "Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals [PeerJ]")
Improving the peer-review process and editorial quality: key errors escaping the review and editorial process in top scientific journals [PeerJ]
The relative impact factor of glamour journals is 2.166 | Bits of DNA
Journal metrics | Nature Research
Frontiers journals in the top of impact metrics – Science & research news | Frontiers
